How I sought to stop worrying and love a Bronze plan

Key takeaways

For many of the 155 million Americans who get their health insurance through an employer, the employer-sponsored plan feels like a security blanket. Look closely, as circumstances may well force you to, and the blanket may be full of holes. Tales of woe from patients who need intense care are plentiful – involving prior authorization hurdles, outright coverage denials for needed care or drugs, and until recently, surprise bills from out-of-network doctors or providers at in-network facilities (Congress at last banned most such billing in the No Surprises Act, effective January 1 of this year). High and rising deductibles, out-of-pocket maximums, and premiums also cause financial hardship for millions of mostly low-income workers.

Still, for the majority of employer plan enrollees whose plans cover about 85% of medical costs while the employer foots the lion’s share of the premium, the health insurance they have is not much of a worry. And people fear losing it.

That was my situation until this spring. While I am self-employed, my wife Cindy has worked at the same hospital for 25 years, which has provided family insurance. In that time we’ve been blessed with pretty good health, and when we’ve needed care, we’ve obtained it without significant hassle, including an operation to remove half my thyroid back in 2004.

Over the years our share of the premium crept up slowly, then jumped from about $200 a month to about $400 in 2016 when Cindy cut back her weekly work hours from 36 to 30 so she could help take care of her 90-something father. It’s now at about $450/month, which is manageable.

Into an ACA marketplace enhanced by the American Rescue Plan

But change comes. Cindy is retiring this month, a little shy of her 64th birthday. The Affordable Care Act was supposed to make this feasible – and since March of last year, when the American Rescue Plan provided a major boost to premium subsidies in the ACA’s health insurance marketplace, the ACA has a far more credible claim than previously to reducing “job lock.”

The ARP subsidy boosts only extend through 2022. Democrats in Congress have intended to extend them further, but with their Build Back Better legislation long stalled, extension now is far from certain.

The ARP reduced the percentage of income required to buy a benchmark Silver plan (the second cheapest Silver plan in each area) at every income level, and it removed the notorious income cap on subsidies. Before the ARP’s enactment in March 2021, people whose family income exceeded 400% of the Federal Poverty Level – currently $51,520 for an individual, $106,000 for a family of four – were ineligible for premium subsidies. Since premiums rise with age – -at age 64, they’re triple what a 21 year-old pays – paying full freight was especially challenging for 60-somethings like Cindy and me. At our age, unsubsidized benchmark premiums are typically $700-800 per month – each – and more in some states (that’s also about what COBRA would cost us).

Now, thanks to the ARP, for anyone at any income level who lacks affordable access to other insurance, a benchmark plan costs no more than 8.5% of income, and much less at lower incomes (in fact, benchmark coverage is free up to 150% FPL). The measure that determines premium subsidies is modified adjusted gross income or MAGI – basically the AGI familiar to tax filers, with a handful of additional income sources (e.g., tax exempt interest) counted.

Thanks to the ARP subsidy boost, with a large payment to my individual 401k reducing our MAGI, Cindy and I can get a benchmark Silver plan for about $400 per month. And unlike in many states, here in New Jersey the plans offered by the dominant marketplace insurers have decent provider networks.

Choices in the New Jersey marketplace
for one 60-something couple*
Health plan Monthly premium (after subsidy) Deductible: single person OOP max: single person
Lowest-cost Bronze (HSA) – AmeriHealth $10 $6,000 $7,050
Lowest-cost Bronze (no HSA) – Horizon BC $255 $3,000 $8,700
Lowest-cost Silver – AmeriHealth $293 $2,500 $8,700
Benchmark (second-lowest cost) Silver – Horizon $404 $2,500 $8,700
* Plans actively considered. Premiums are net of subsidy. Single-person deductibles and OOP maxes are double for the couple.

What plan to buy? Comfort vs. math

Still, I am entering this individual insurance with some trepidation. Here’s why.

For years I’ve been closely observing and writing about the Affordable Care Act, on my blog, here at healthinsurance.org, and in various other publications. Brokers and other experts have drummed one salient fact into my head: For shoppers in the ACA marketplace with income over 200% FPL ($25,760 for an individual, $53,000 for a family of four), Bronze-level plans usually make the most economic sense. Bronze plans are the cheapest of four metal levels, and Bronze deductibles average over $7,000 for an individual, $14,000 for a family.

The picture is different for people with income under 200% FPL. Below that threshold, secondary cost-sharing reduction subsidies, available only with Silver plans and at no extra cost to the enrollee, reduce out-of-pocket costs to levels below those of the average employer-sponsored plans, making Silver the best choice for most low-income enrollees. CSR, which is strongest at the lowest incomes, reduces deductibles to an average below $150 at incomes up to 150% FPL and below $700 at an income in the 150-200% FPL. CSR weakens to near-insignificance at 200% FPL and phases out entirely at 250% FPL. While less than a third the population lives in households with income below 200% FPL, more than half of ACA marketplace enrollees do.

At higher incomes, Silver plan deductibles average more than $4,700, though in many plans a number of services, including doctor visits, are not subject to the deductible. That’s considerably lower than the Bronze average (over $7,000) – but generally not enough to justify the difference in premiums. That’s especially true because the annual out-of-pocket (OOP) maximum in Silver plans without CSR (that is, all Silver plans for people with income above 250% FPL) is generally not significantly below the Bronze plan OOP max. Both are usually north of $7,000 for an individual and often near or at the highest allowable, $8,700 per person.

Because premiums rise with age, the field tilts further toward Bronze plans for older enrollees. As the premium for a benchmark Silver plan rises, so does the subsidy, since all enrollees with the same income pay the same premium (a fixed percentage of income) for the benchmark plan. As the premium rises, so does the “spread” between the benchmark premium and cheaper plans. While my wife and I would pay $400 a month for benchmark Silver, we can get the cheapest Bronze plan on the market (from the same insurer) for about $10 per month.

Another consideration? HSAs

Still another factor points us toward that cheaper Bronze plan: it’s a so-called high deductible health plan (HDHP) that can be linked to a tax-sheltered health savings account (HSA). These plans, which are mostly Bronze-level, conform to special IRS rules. One is that they cannot exempt any services other than the free preventive screenings mandated by the ACA from the deductible ($6,000 per person in the Bronze plan we are likely to enroll in). That increases my anxiety: we’ll be paying cash for virtually all the medical care we access, unless we get ill or injured enough to hit the deductible. At the same time, HSA-linked plans, by statute, have lower out-of-pocket maximums than most Bronze or Silver plans, topping out at $7,050 per individual. That’s better than the two cheapest Silver plans, which both have OOP maxes of $8,700 per person. Finally, HSA contributions – up to $7,300 for Cindy and me – also reduce MAGI, and so the premium we will pay, as well as our taxes.

With the HSA contribution figured in (I left it out of my income estimate), the Bronze HSA plan we’ve settled on will probably ultimately be available for zero premium. The single-person maximum exposure, $7,050, is not much higher than what we pay in premiums in our employer-sponsored plans (about $5,400 annually) – or than what we’d pay for the benchmark Silver plan, which has a higher OOP max ($17,400 for two, vs. $14,100 for the HSA Bronze).

The cheapest Silver plan available would cost us about $300 per month, with a per-person deductible of $2,500. If both of us turn out to need a lot of medical care but not too much – say, $6,000 each – we could conceivably pay less on net under that plan, which pays 60% of most costs after the deductible is met, up to the OOP cap. But the odds of that are small. And again, if one of us needs tens of thousands of dollars in care – not unusual in U.S. medicine – we’ll pay less under the Bronze HDHP plan.

Psychological factors: it’s not cheaper if it kills you

The chief argument against a high deductible Bronze plan is psychological, but real. Some years ago, Dr. Ashish Jha, currently the Biden administration’s COVID-19 policy coordinator, tried a personal family experiment – enrolling in a high-deductible plan – and wrote up the results. Jha suffers from supraventricular tachycardia, a condition that makes his heart race periodically. One morning, he woke up with his heart racing, and it persisted for about a half hour. He knew that going to the ER would cost him thousands; he also knew that he would advise a patient to go. Instead he rode it out, and his heart calmed down. “I was lucky — I had rolled the dice and things had worked out,” Jha writes.

Cindy and I are both 63. That’s a bad age to be loathe to go to the ER – or to hesitate to get an unfamiliar twinge somewhere in our bodies checked out. Perhaps having money sequestered in an HSA will reduce the psychological resistance – those funds are dedicated to medical fees. But it’s still real money: if we don’t spend it, we can roll it into our retirement funds when we reach Medicare age. Being willing to spend it still requires a psychological adjustment.

If a Silver plan for $300 per month were our only choice, I’d probably be reasonably content. The prospect of paying next to nothing for an HDHP Bronze plan makes me nervous. But it’s hard to escape the math.

Assessing the ACA marketplace

Two things are notable about the private plans subsidized by the ACA as enhanced by the ARP. First, for almost all comers, plans with an affordable premium are available – in fact, Bronze plans with zero premium, or close to it, are available pretty high up the income ladder, especially for older adults. Second, out-of-pocket costs are high. At incomes over 200% FPL, it’s hard to avoid out-of-pocket maximums below $7,000 for an individual and $14,000 for a couple or family.

Why are out-of-pocket costs in these subsidized plans so high? Several reasons. First, American healthcare is just expensive – we pay almost triple the OECD average per capita, while using less care per capita than the OECD average. Second, to avoid all-out opposition to health reform from the healthcare industry (and in a failed attempt to win Republican buy-in), the Democrats who created the Affordable Care Act created a marketplace of private plans, paying commercial rates to providers – which average about twice Medicare rates for hospital payments and perhaps 130-160% of Medicare for physicians. Finally, healthcare scholars advising the ACA’s drafters believed that subjecting enrollees to high out-of-pocket costs – giving them ‘skin in the game” – was an effective way to reduce unnecessary care and so control costs (an idea substantially discredited by multiple studies indicating that enrollees faced with high out-of-pocket costs skip necessary as well as unnecessary care).

My wife and I are entering what two or three decades ago might have been understood as a moderate or even mainstream Republican health insurance utopia. We are paying close to nothing in premiums, and we are massively incentivized to save a huge chunk of our income in tax-sheltered accounts to keep it that way. The federal government is kicking in $1400 a month. We are on the hook for up to $14,100 in out-of-pocket expenses. If we’re healthy and don’t come near that threshold, we’ll pay cash for every medical service we access except for free preventive screenings.

I am very glad that the ACA was enacted and that Republicans failed to repeal it in 2017. (My personal welfare aside, the ACA’s core programs saved the country from a surge in the uninsured population during the pandemic.) As Cindy and I enter our life’s final quarter (or third, if we’re actuarially lucky), I’m grateful that affordable coverage is available in the hold-your-breath-till-Medicare years that will shield us from costs that could seriously impact our long-term financial health.

I can imagine a simpler and more cost-effective system – one that pays uniform rates to healthcare providers and offers a very short menu of affordable choices with low out-of-pocket costs to all Americans. But given the health system we have, and current political realities, my personal ask is more immediate and plausible: extend the ARP subsidy boosts. They’ve given the ACA a credible claim to live up to its name.

Andrew Sprung is a freelance writer who blogs about politics and healthcare policy at xpostfactoid. His articles about the Affordable Care Act have appeared in publications including The American Prospect, Health Affairs, The Atlantic, and The New Republic. He is the winner of the National Institute of Health Care Management’s 2016 Digital Media Award. He holds a Ph.D. in English literature from the University of Rochester.

How the Build Back Better legislation might affect your coverage

Key takeaways

Just before Thanksgiving, the House of Representatives passed the Build Back Better Act (HR5376) and sent it to the Senate. The version that the House approved was scaled down from the initial proposal, but it’s still a robust bill that would create jobs, protect the environment, help families meet their needs, and improve access to health care.

Lawmakers had initially hoped that the bill would be enacted before Christmas. But the situation has changed in December, with West Virginia Senator Joe Manchin stating recently that he will not vote for the current Build Back Better legislation. The situation is still in flux, and it’s noteworthy that the nation’s largest coal miners union has asked Manchin to reconsider his position.

For the time being, we don’t know what might come of this. Manchin might reconsider, or the legislation might be changed to support his earlier requests, or it might be scrapped altogether and replaced with various piecemeal bills.

But for now, we wanted to explain how the House’s version of the Build Back Better Act would affect your health insurance in 2022 and future years. We’ll also clarify what you can already count on in 2022, even without the Build Back Better Act. And how should you handle the current open enrollment period, given that the legislation is still up in the air?

Let’s start with a summary of how the House’s version of the BBBA would affect people who buy their own health insurance (keeping in mind that we don’t know whether the Senate will pass any version of the BBBA, and if they do, what changes might be incorporated):

Law would extend larger and more widely available subsidies

The enhanced premium tax credit (subsidy) structure created by the American Rescue Plan (ARP) would remain in place through 2025, instead of ending after 2022. This would mean:

  • There would continue to be no “subsidy cliff” through 2025. Subsidies would be available to households earning more than 400% of the poverty level, as long as the cost of the benchmark plan would otherwise be more than 8.5% of household income.
  • Subsidies would continue to be larger than they were prior to the ARP. People with household income up to 150% of the poverty level would be able to enroll in the benchmark plan at no cost. And people with income above that level would continue to pay a smaller percentage of their income for the benchmark plan, relative to what they had to pay pre-ARP.

These enhanced subsidies have made coverage much more affordable in 2021, and the BBBA would extend them for another three years.

It’s also important to note that HHS finalized a new rule this year that allows year-round enrollment via HealthCare.gov for people whose income doesn’t exceed 150% of the poverty level. This rule remains in place for as long as people at that income level are eligible for $0 premium benchmark plans. Under the ARP, that would just be through 2022. But the BBBA would extend the availability of this special enrollment opportunity through 2025.

BBBA would include one-year extension of unemployment-related subsidies

The ARP’s subsidies related to unemployment compensation would be available in 2022, instead of ending after this year. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) projects that about a million people will receive these enhanced subsidies, and that about half of them would otherwise be uninsured in 2022.

Under the ARP, if a person receives unemployment compensation at any point in 2021, any income above 133% of the poverty level is disregarded when they apply for a marketplace plan. That means they’re eligible for a $0 benchmark plan and full cost-sharing reductions (CSR).

The BBBA would set the income disregard threshold at 150% of FPL for a person who receives unemployment compensation in 2022. But the effect would be the same, as applicants at that income are eligible for $0 benchmark plans and full CSR. As noted above, there’s also a year-round enrollment opportunity for people whose income doesn’t exceed 150% of the poverty level (that’s available in all states that use HealthCare.gov; state-run marketplaces can choose whether or not to offer it).

As is the case under the ARP, the unemployment-related subsidies would be available for the whole year if the person receives unemployment compensation for at least one week of the year. But as is also the case under the ARP, the marketplace subsidies would not be available for any month that the person is eligible for Medicare or an employer-sponsored plan that’s considered affordable and provides minimum value.

Law would close Medicaid coverage gap for 2022-2025

In 11 states that have refused to expand Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act, there’s a coverage gap for people whose income is under the poverty level. As of 2019, there were more than 2.2 million people caught in this coverage gap (mostly in Texas, Florida, Georgia, and North Carolina). They are ineligible for Medicaid and also ineligible for premium subsidies in the marketplace.

The BBBA would close the coverage gap for 2022 through 2025. The current rules (which only allow marketplace premium subsidies if an applicant’s income is at least 100% of the poverty level) would be changed to allow premium subsidies regardless of how low a person’s income is.

This would be applicable nationwide, but subsidies would continue to be unavailable if a person is eligible for Medicaid. So in most states, subsidies would continue to be available only for applicants with income above 138% of the poverty level, as Medicaid is available below that level in the 38 states that have expanded Medicaid under the ACA.

In 2022, people who would otherwise be in the coverage gap would be eligible for $0 benchmark plans and full cost-sharing reductions (CSR). In 2023 through 2025, they would continue to be eligible for $0 benchmark plans, and their cost-sharing reductions would become more robust. Instead of covering 94% of costs for an average standard population (which is currently the most robust level of CSR), their plans would cover 99% of a standard population’s costs.

The CBO projects that the BBBA’s subsidy enhancements would increase the number of people with subsidized marketplace coverage by about 3.6 million. Many of those individuals would otherwise be in the coverage gap and uninsured.

Nothing would change about Medicaid eligibility or subsidy eligibility in the states that have expanded Medicaid. But the BBBA would provide additional federal funding for Medicaid expansion in those states for 2023 through 2025. Currently, the federal government pays 90% of the cost of Medicaid expansion, and that would grow to 93% for those three years.

Build Back Better Act would improve insulin coverage

The BBBA would require individual and group health plans to cover certain insulins before the deductible is met, starting in 2023. Enrollees would pay no more than $35 for a 30-day supply of insulin (or 25% of the cost of the insulin, if that’s a smaller amount).

This requirement would apply to catastrophic plans as well as metal-level plans. And although HSA-qualified high-deductible health plans are often excluded from new coverage mandates, that would not be the case here. In 2019, the IRS implemented new rules that allow HSA-qualified plans to cover, on a pre-deductible basis, some types of care aimed at controlling chronic conditions; insulin is among them.

Law would reset affordability rules for employer-sponsored coverage

Under ACA rules, a person cannot get premium subsidies in the marketplace if they have access to an employer-sponsored plan that provides minimum value and is considered affordable.

Under current rules, an employer-sponsored plan would be considered affordable in 2022 if the employee’s cost for employee-only coverage isn’t more than 9.61% of the employee’s household income. Under the BBBA, this threshold would be reset to 8.5% of household income for 2022 through 2025.

For some employees, this would make marketplace subsidies newly available. And for others, employers might opt to cover more of their premium costs, making their employer-sponsored coverage more affordable. But some employers might simply stop offering employer-sponsored coverage altogether, despite the fact that they would potentially be subject to the ACA’s employer mandate penalty if they have 50 or more employees (if an employer stops offering coverage, the employees can enroll in a marketplace plan with income-based subsidies).

It’s important to note that the BBBA would not address the family glitch. So the family members of employees who have an offer of affordable self-only coverage would continue to be ineligible for marketplace subsidies if they have access to the employer-sponsored plan, regardless of the cost. But prominent health law scholars have opined that the Biden administration could fix the family glitch administratively, without legislation. There is some cause to hope that the administration may do so.

BBA would make changes to MAGI calculation

The ACA has its own definition of modified adjusted gross income (MAGI), used to determine eligibility for premium tax credits and cost-sharing reductions (a very similar version of MAGI is used to determine eligibility for CHIP, Medicaid expansion, and Medicaid for children and pregnant women).

The BBBA would make a couple of changes to the way MAGI is calculated when a tax dependent has income or the household receives a lump sum payment from Social Security:

  • Through 2026, the first $3,500 in income earned by dependents would not have to be added to the family’s household income.
  • From 2022 onward, lump sum Social Security payments attributable to prior years would not have to be included in a person’s MAGI. The median processing time for a Social Security disability appeal is well over a year, so it’s common for people to wait a long time and then suddenly receive several months of Social Security payments all at one time. This can sometimes result in them having to repay premium tax credits for the year in which they receive the lump sum. The BBBA would prevent that in future years.

What does this mean for the current open enrollment period?

Given that the legislation is still up in the air, here’s what you need to keep in mind when enrolling in coverage for 2022:

General subsidies

  • There is no set income cap for marketplace subsidies in 2022. That provision is already in place, and doesn’t depend on the BBBA. (Your eligibility for a subsidy does depend on your income, but that eligibility now extends above 400% of the poverty level in most places, depending on your age.)
  • The more robust subsidy structure that the ARP introduced this year will continue to be in effect in 2022, regardless of whether the BBBA is enacted.
  • Subsidies are much larger and more widely available than they were last fall. And most of the ARP’s subsidy enhancements were already slated to continue through 2022. This means most enrollees can sign up now and rest assured that their 2022 coverage options and subsidy amounts will not change if and when the BBBA is enacted.

Unemployment-related subsidies

  • If you received unemployment compensation in 2021 and got the ARP’s unemployment-related subsidies, you may find that your after-subsidy premium is currently slated to increase significantly for 2022, due to the expiration of the unemployment-based subsidies.
  • If you’re still going to be receiving unemployment compensation after the start of 2022, you might end up qualifying for another round of robust subsidies in 2022. But that will depend on the BBBA. For the time being, the application will just ask for your projected income, which will need to include the total amount that you expect to earn in 2022. That might result in a substantial subsidy or not, depending on your household’s specific details.
  • The fact that open enrollment continues through at least January 15 in most states can be used to your advantage. For now, you can enroll in the plan that best fits your budget based on the existing subsidy rules for 2022. (In some states, you still have time to sign up for coverage that starts January 1, although most states are now enrolling people in plans with February effective dates.) If the BBBA is enacted in early January, you would then have a chance to pick a different plan prior to the end of the open enrollment period. It would have a February effective date (or March, depending on the state) and your out-of-pocket costs would reset to $0 on the new plan. But for some people, this will be the opportunity to upgrade from a Bronze plan to a Silver plan, so it’s worth considering as an option if you know that you’ll still be receiving unemployment compensation after the start of 2022.
  • If the BBBA isn’t enacted by mid-January, you should still keep an eye on this. A different version of the bill, or smaller piecemeal versions, might be enacted later in 2022. If that happens and unemployment-based subsidies are included in the final legislation, you might become eligible for new subsidies at that point. That may or may not come with a special enrollment period to allow people receiving unemployment compensation to switch plans. For now, it’s all up in the air, but the situation could change in 2022.

Learn how you might avoid the coverage gap

If you have a low income, are in a state that hasn’t expanded Medicaid, and the marketplace is showing that you’re not eligible for any premium tax credits, you’ll want to read this article about ways to avoid the coverage gap.

Assuming you can’t get out of the coverage gap for the time being, you’ll want to keep a close eye on the BBBA. If it’s enacted with the same coverage gap provisions that the House approved, you may be eligible for full premium tax credits as of early 2022. And you’d have a chance to enroll in coverage at that point.

Louise Norris is an individual health insurance broker who has been writing about health insurance and health reform since 2006. She has written dozens of opinions and educational pieces about the Affordable Care Act for healthinsurance.org. Her state health exchange updates are regularly cited by media who cover health reform and by other health insurance experts.

The post How the Build Back Better legislation might affect your coverage appeared first on healthinsurance.org.

Why your ACA premium might be going up for 2022

Key takeaways

As has been the case for the last few years, average individual and family health insurance rate changes for 2022 are mostly modest. The nationwide average increase is about 3.5%, and there are new insurers joining the marketplaces in the majority of the states.

That all sounds like great news, but the reality is a bit more complex. The modest average rate changes apply to full-price plans, but most marketplace enrollees do not pay full price. And although new insurers bring added competition, their entry could also mean a sharp reduction in premium subsidy amounts, depending on how the new insurer prices its plans.

So despite the headlines about small average rate changes, the rate change for your specific plan might be nowhere near that average. But that doesn’t necessarily mean you have to swallow a large increase.

What affects fluctuations in what you pay for insurance premiums?

The annual premium changes that grab headlines and that factor into state and federal averages are for full-price premiums. But very few marketplace/exchange enrollees pay full price. Most receive premium tax credits (subsidies), which means that their rate changes will also depend on how much their subsidy amount fluctuates from one year to the next.

ACA tax credits are set so that the enrollee pays a fixed percentage of income for the benchmark plan – the second-cheapest Silver plan in their area. When the unsubsidized benchmark plan premium changes from year-to-year, so does the size of the tax credit. If a discount insurer enters the market, your tax credit may shrink. That doesn’t matter if you choose the benchmark plan, but it may make other plans more expensive.

The averages also lump each insurer’s plans together, so although an insurer might have an average rate change of 5%, it could have a range of -10% to +20% across all of its plans.

And average rate changes also don’t account for the fact that rates increase with age. Even if your health plan has no annual rate changes at all for any of its plans, your pre-subsidy price will still be higher in the coming year simply because you’re a year older (if you receive subsidies, the subsidies will increase to keep pace with the age-related premium increases).

Anatomy of a drastic increase in premium payment

Let’s consider Monique, who is 36 years old, lives in Lincoln, Nebraska, and has an annual income of $35,000. This year, she’s enrolled in a Silver EPO plan from Medica (Medica with CHI Health Silver Copay) that has a $4,800 deductible, $45 copays for primary care visits, and an $8,150 cap on out-of-pocket costs. She pays no monthly premiums at all, because the full-price cost of the plan in 2021 is $504/month (based on her being 35 when she enrolled in that plan), and she’s eligible for a subsidy of $513/month.

Full-price premiums in Nebraska are increasing by more than the national average for 2022, with an average increase of a little less than 9%. But imagine Monique’s surprise when her renewal notice showed that her after-subsidy premium would be going from $0/month in 2021 to $226/month in 2022.

Why is her premium going up so much, when average full-price rate increases in Nebraska are in the single-digit range?

New health plan options can affect benchmark plans – and your subsidies

Nebraska is a good example of a place where there’s a lot more competition in 2022. Oscar and Ambetter have both joined the marketplace statewide, and the number of available plans has more than quadrupled. When Monique was shopping for plans last fall, she had a total of 22 options from which to choose. For 2022, however, she can pick from among 95 different plans.

In 2021, the benchmark plan (second-lowest-cost Silver plan) was offered by Medica and had a pre-subsidy price tag of $657/month. But for 2022, Ambetter offers the lowest-cost Silver plans in Lincoln, so they have taken over the benchmark spot. And the second-lowest-cost Silver plan for a 36-year-old now has a pre-subsidy premium of just $475.

So in Monique’s case, the cost of the benchmark plan has dropped by $182/month. And since subsidy amounts are based on the cost of the benchmark plan, Monique’s subsidy is also much smaller for 2022 – it doesn’t need to be as large in order to keep the cost of the benchmark plan at the level that’s considered affordable.

In addition, Medica has raised the base price of Monique’s plan from $504/month in 2021 to $560/month in 2022. That’s partially due to Monique’s increasing age, and partially due to the 10% overall average rate increase that Medica imposed for 2022.

The perfect storm for a large net rate increase?

That’s a perfect storm for a large net rate increase: The benchmark premium has dropped by $182/month while her health plan’s rate has increased by $56/month.

In 2021, Medica offered both the lowest-cost and second-lowest-cost Silver plan in Lincoln, and there was a significant difference in price between the two plans ($504/month for the lowest-cost, versus $657/month for the second-lowest-cost). Monique’s plan was the lowest-cost Silver option, and the large difference in premium between her plan and the benchmark plan explained why she was able to enroll in her plan with no premium at all. all. (A spread that big between the two cheapest Silver plans is unusual and creates a huge discount for the cheapest Silver plan when it happens.)

But that’s no longer the case for 2022. Ambetter has the four lowest-cost Silver plans in the area, and there’s only a $17 difference in price across all four of them. The two lowest-cost Silver plans are actually priced at exactly the same amount. As a result, the cheapest Silver plan that Monique can get for 2022 is going to be $141/month.

The two plans at that price both have lower out-of-pocket costs than her current plan. (They’re capped at $6,450 and $6,100, versus $8,550, which is the new out-of-pocket limit that her existing plan will have in 2022.) But non-preventive office visits are only covered after the deductible is met, whereas her current plan has copays for office visits right from the start. (Certain preventive care is covered in full on all plans, without a need to pay any deductible or copays.)

You may not be stuck with that higher 2022 premium.

The good news for Monique is that she’s not stuck with her new $226/month premium. There are 15 Silver plans that are less expensive than that for 2022, and there are also 43 Bronze plans that are less expensive, including several that are under $50/month. Bronze plans do tend to have fairly high out-of-pocket costs. But Monique can select from among three Bronze plans offered by Bright Health that include pre-deductible coverage for things like primary care visits, outpatient mental health care, and urgent care visits, with monthly premiums that range from $18 to $42.

Although those Bright Health Plans do have deductibles that are higher than her current Medica plan, she might find that she comes out ahead on out-of-pocket costs due to the more robust pre-deductible coverage that they provide. And that might be especially true when she factors in the premium savings: A plan that costs $18/month will save her more than $200/month in premiums, compared with renewing her current plan.

The takeaway point here is to not panic if your plan’s premium is increasing by a lot more than you might have expected. Even if your rate is increasing significantly, you might find that there are other options available that will be a better fit for your budget.

The fact that there are more plans available in most areas of the country for 2022 can be a plus or a minus, depending on the circumstances. In Monique’s case, a new plan has taken over the benchmark spot and reduced her subsidy amount. But there are also dozens of other new plans in her area, many of which might be a perfect fit for her medical needs.

How to find solid replacement coverage with a lower net premium

In order to pick a plan, Monique will need to consider the whole picture, including total premium costs, expected out-of-pocket medical costs, and provider networks. If she takes any medications, she’ll need to compare the various plan options to see whether her drugs are covered and how much she can expect to pay at the pharmacy.

Although this article focuses on plans available in Lincoln, Nebraska, people in other parts of the country can be facing varying degrees of surprising net rate increases, even when overall full-price rate changes in their area are fairly modest.

In states that use HealthCare.gov, the average enrollee can select from among almost 108 plans for 2022, up from just 61 in 2021. Even if the benchmark plan in your area has remained unchanged, the influx of new plans might mean that there’s a better option available for you in 2022, and now’s your chance to switch your coverage. It’s never in your best interest to just let your plan auto-renew without considering the other options, and that’s especially true when there are so many new plans available.

In every community, there are brokers and Navigators who can help you understand what’s happening with your current plan, and consider whether a plan change might be in your best interest. For more information about selecting a plan during open – and open enrollment deadlines in your state – read our 2022 Guide to ACA Open Enrollment.

Louise Norris is an individual health insurance broker who has been writing about health insurance and health reform since 2006. She has written dozens of opinions and educational pieces about the Affordable Care Act for healthinsurance.org. Her state health exchange updates are regularly cited by media who cover health reform and by other health insurance experts.

 

The post Why your ACA premium might be going up for 2022 appeared first on healthinsurance.org.

How new carriers in your marketplace could affect your coverage options

Recent news about individual-market health insurance has been largely centered around the American Rescue Plan and how it’s made coverage in 2021 much more affordable than it used to be. Now, as we approach ACA’s annual open enrollment period, it’s a good time to look ahead to what we can expect to happen with 2022 coverage.

Fortunately, the ARP’s enhanced subsidies will still be in effect in 2022 – and possibly longer, if Congress can agree on an extension. That means subsidies will continue to be larger than they used to be, and more widely available, including to households earning more than 400% of the poverty level.

For 2022 individual/family coverage, we’re seeing some wide variation in proposed and finalized rate changes across the country. Average rates will decrease in some areas and increase in others, with modest single-digit rate changes in most places.

(Since the ARP has eliminated the income cap for subsidy eligibility for 2021 and 2022, few enrollees will see these rate changes reflected in their actual premiums, since most enrollees get premium subsidies. But rate changes do affect the size of the subsidy amount, and that can result in changes for after-subsidy premiums, as explained below.)

Increased insurer participation in marketplaces continues

But we’re also seeing widespread continuation of the increasing insurer participation trend that’s been ongoing since 2019. In 2017 and 2018, insurers fled the ACA’s exchanges – or even the entire individual/family market. But that started to turn around in 2019, and insurer participation increased again in 2020 and 2021.

For 2022, that trend is continuing. Some big-name insurers that previously scaled back their marketplace participation are rejoining various marketplaces, and some smaller regional insurers are joining marketplaces or expanding their existing footprints.

Where are new carriers entering ACA’s marketplace for 2022?

Here’s a summary of some of the major individual/family insurers that are entering new markets for 2022:

More carriers = more plan options …

That’s in addition to numerous coverage area expansions by existing marketplace insurers in many states. Based on the rate filings that we’ve analyzed thus far, we anticipate that many  – if not most – marketplace enrollees will have more plan options available for 2022 than they had this year.

One of the goals of the ACA was to increase competition in the individual health insurance market. The exchanges are set up to facilitate that, with enrollees able to compare options from all of the participating insurers and select the plan that best fits their needs.

From that perspective, increasing insurer participation and competition in the exchange is good. And it does give people more plans from which to choose, which can also be a good thing. But too many choices can overwhelm applicants and result in poor decision making.

… and a new carrier could also affect premium subsidies

In addition to delivering more plan options, carriers expanding into an area might also affect premium subsidies in that area. How much effect will depend on how the new plans are priced in comparison with the existing plans – keeping in mind that rates change each year on January 1 regardless of whether any new insurers are entering the market.

Premium subsidy amounts are based on the cost of the benchmark plan in each area. But since that just refers to the second-lowest-cost Silver plan, it’s not necessarily the same plan from one year to the next. If a new insurer enters the market with low-priced plans, the insurer may undercut the current benchmark and take over the second-lowest-cost spot. If the premium is lower than the benchmark plan’s price would otherwise have been, the result is smaller premium subsidies for everyone in that area.

For people in that area who prefer to keep their existing plan (as opposed to switching to the new lower-cost options), this can result in an increase in after-subsidy premiums, since the subsidies are smaller than they would otherwise have been. We can see an example of this in the Phoenix area in 2019 and 2020, when new insurers entered the market with lower-priced plans that reduced the size of premium subsidies in the area.

To clarify, anything that reduces the cost of the benchmark premium will result in smaller subsidies. This can be a new lower-cost insurer entering the market, or existing insurers reducing their rates. An example of this can be seen in how after-subsidy premiums increased for many of Colorado’s exchange enrollees in 2020, when the state’s new reinsurance program reduced average pre-subsidy premiums by about 20%. The reduction helped unsubsidized enrollees (mostly those with incomes over the limit for subsidy eligibility, which has been removed at least through 2022) but resulted in higher net premiums for many enrollees who qualified for subsidies.

Although the vast majority of exchange enrollees do qualify for premium subsidies (especially now that the American Rescue Plan has eliminated the “subsidy cliff” for 2021 and 2022) some enrollees do not. For these enrollees, the introduction of a new insurer simply broadens their plan options, and does not affect their premiums unless they choose to switch to the new plan.

And of course, if the new insurer has plans that are priced higher than the existing benchmark plan, the carrier’s entry will not affect net premiums paid by subsidized enrollees.

Plan to compare your coverage options during open enrollment

It will be several weeks before all the details are clear in terms of rate changes and plan availability for 2022 coverage. But it appears that the trend of increasing competition in the exchanges will continue.

And although the American Rescue Plan’s enhanced subsidy structure will still be in place in 2022 – making subsidies larger and more widely available than they would otherwise have been – it’s still possible for a new insurer to disrupt the market and end up adjusting the size of premium subsidies in a given area.

Open enrollment for 2022 coverage will begin November 1. Actively comparing your options during open enrollment is always the best approach, and that’s especially true if a new insurer will be offering plans in your area. Letting your current plan auto-renew without comparison shopping is never in your best interest.

If a new insurer is joining the marketplace, you may find that its plans are a perfect fit for your needs. Or you might find that your best option is to switch to a different plan because your after-subsidy premiums are increasing due to the new insurer undercutting the price of the current benchmark plan. Switching plans might be a non-starter due to your provider network or drug formulary needs, but you won’t know for sure until you consider the various options that are available to you.

Ask a professional how a new carrier could impact your coverage

We have an overview of factors to keep in mind when you’re choosing a health plan, but it’s also worthwhile to seek out professional advice. Enrollment assistance is available from brokers, enrollment counselors, and Navigators.

Brokers are licensed and regulated by state insurance departments, and must also have certification from the exchange in order to help people enroll in health plans offered through the exchange. Training and testing are necessary in order to obtain the license and certification, and brokers must also complete ongoing continuing education in order to maintain their credentials.

Broker training encompasses a wide range of topics, including ethics, fraud prevention, evolving insurance laws and regulations, and health plan details. The training and regulatory oversight make brokers a reliable source of information and assistance with initial plan selections and enrollments as well as future issues that might arise as the health plan is utilized.

Navigators should be much more widely available this fall, as the Biden administration has allocated $80 million for this year’s Navigator grants in the states that use HealthCare.gov. (The previous high was $63 million in 2016; the Trump administration subsequently reduced it to $36 million in 2017 and to $10 million each year from 2018 through 2020.) The Biden administration has also proposed a return to expanded duties for Navigators, which would provide consumers with increased access to post-enrollment assistance with their coverage.

In short, enrollment assistance should be widely available this fall, and it’s in your best interest to use it. A recent report from Young Invincibles highlights the myriad ways that enrollment assisters help consumers – it’s more than just picking a plan.

Regardless of where you seek assistance, it won’t cost you anything – and a broker, Navigator, or enrollment counselor will be able to help you determine the impact of any new insurers that will be offering plans in your area for 2022, and help you make sense of the options available to you.

Louise Norris is an individual health insurance broker who has been writing about health insurance and health reform since 2006. She has written dozens of opinions and educational pieces about the Affordable Care Act for healthinsurance.org. Her state health exchange updates are regularly cited by media who cover health reform and by other health insurance experts.

The post How new carriers in your marketplace could affect your coverage options appeared first on healthinsurance.org.

Are accumulators making you think twice about switching health plans?

For millions of Americans who don’t have access to employer-sponsored or government-run health insurance, the American Rescue Plan (ARP) does a lot to make health coverage more affordable this year. Premium subsidies are larger, and more people will qualify for premium-free plans, including anyone receiving unemployment compensation at any point in 2021.

If you’re currently uninsured or enrolled in something like a short-term plan or health care sharing ministry plan and you’ve become eligible for premium subsidies as a result of the ARP, it’s likely an obvious choice to enroll in a plan through the marketplace in your state as soon as possible. And there’s a COVID/ARP enrollment window that continues through August 15 in most states, making it easy to enroll in a new plan and take advantage of the new subsidies.

But if you’re already enrolled in an ACA-compliant plan, or even a grandmothered or grandfathered major medical plan, you’ll have to decide whether you want to make a plan change during the COVID/ARP enrollment window. And depending on the circumstances, it might not be an easy decision.

Are out-of-pocket costs you’ve paid making you think twice?

Unlike plan changes made during open enrollment, plan changes made during the COVID/ARP enrollment window will take effect mid-year. And for people who have already paid some or all of their deductible and out-of-pocket costs this year, that adds an extra layer of complication to the switch-or-not decision.

Normally, the general rule of thumb is that if you switch to a new plan mid-year, you’re going to be starting over at $0 on the new plan’s deductible and out-of-pocket expenses. (These are called accumulators, since it’s a running total of the expenses you’ve accumulated toward your out-of-pocket maximum). For someone whose accumulators have already amounted to a sizable sum of money this year, having to start over at $0 in the middle of the year could be a deal-breaker.

Are ARP’s higher subsidies worth it?

But 2021 is not a normal year. The ARP has made significant changes to subsidy amounts and eligibility, and a lot of people will find that switching plans enables them to best take advantage of the enhanced subsidies. For example:

  • A person who previously enrolled off-exchange in order to take advantage of the “silver switch” approach to cost-sharing reduction funding, and who is now eligible for a premium subsidy in the exchange.
  • A person who enrolled in a bronze plan during open enrollment but is now eligible for a $0 premium or low-premium Silver or Gold plan (depending on location) due to income or unemployment compensation.
  • A person who was eligible for cost-sharing reductions but selected a bronze or gold plan during open enrollment because the silver plans were too expensive, but who can now afford the silver plan due to the extra subsidies (cost-sharing reductions are only available on silver plans)

If you switch plans, will you have to start over at zero?

The good news is that many states, state-run marketplaces, and insurers have taken action to ensure that accumulators will transfer to a new plan. (In virtually all cases, this does have to be a new plan with the same insurer — if you switch to a different insurance company, you’ll almost certainly have to start over at $0 on your accumulators.)

HealthCare.gov is the exchange/marketplace that’s used in 36 states. Its official position is that “any consumer who selects a new plan may have their accumulators, such as deductibles, reset to zero.” But insurance commissioners in some of those states have stepped in to require insurers to transfer accumulators, and in other states, all of the insurers have voluntarily agreed to do so. Washington, DC, and 14 states have state-run marketplaces, and several of them have announced that insurers will transfer accumulators.

Which states are helping with accumulators?

We’ve combed through communications from state-run marketplaces and state insurance commissioners to see which ones have issued guidance on this. But regardless of where you live, your best bet is to reach out to your insurance company before you make a plan change. Find out exactly how they’re handling accumulators during this enrollment window, and if they are transferring accumulators to new plans, make sure that you adhere to whatever requirements they may have in place.

That said, here’s what we found in terms of how states and state-run marketplaces are addressing accumulators and mid-year plan changes in 2021.

States where all accumulators will transfer as long as your old and new plans are offered by the same insurance company

  • Colorado
  • District of Columbia – The marketplace has confirmed that all accumulators will transfer.
  • Idaho – Idaho only allowed people to switch to a plan offered by their current insurer, unless they had a qualifying event. Note that Idaho’s COVID/ARP enrollment window ended April 30, which is much earlier than the rest of the country.
  • Maryland – Plan changes are limited to upgrades, but the marketplace confirmed that accumulators will transfer.
  • Michigan – Deductibles will transfer, although some insurers will only allow this if you’re upgrading your plan. (Two insurers are allowing deductible transfers even if you’re switching from a different insurer’s plan.)
  • Minnesota – Minnesota is currently not allowing marketplace enrollees to switch plans during the COVID/ARP enrollment window, although this may change within the next several weeks. So for now, the accumulator transfers only apply to people switching from an off-exchange plan to an on-exchange plan. All four of the insurers that offer both on-exchange and off-exchange plans have agreed to transfer accumulators to the on-exchange plans.
  • New Mexico
  • New York
  • Tennessee
  • Vermont – Like Minnesota, Vermont is currently only allowing people to switch from off-exchange (full-cost individual direct enrollment) to on-exchange plans. Accumulators will transfer for those plan changes.
  • West Virginia — The WV Office of the Insurance Commissioner confirmed that both insurers are transferring accumulators, with the exception of a transfer between an HSA-qualified plan and a non-HSA-qualified plan (mainly due to IRS regulations for how HSA-qualified plans must handle out-of-pocket costs).
  • Wisconsin – Covering Wisconsin, a nonprofit enrollment assistance organization, notes that accumulators will not transfer if people select a plan from a different insurer, which is to be expected.

In some states, rules are slightly more complicated

  • Alaska – Deductibles will reset to $0 if a policyholder is switching from off-exchange to on-exchange (or vice-versa), but will not reset if the move is from one exchange plan to another, with the same insurer.
  • California – The marketplace has confirmed that insurers will transfer accumulators for plan holders switching from an off-exchange plan to an on-exchange plan or from one exchange plan to another, as long as they stay with the same insurance company and the same type of managed care plan (ie, HMO to HMO, or PPO to PPO).
  • New Jersey – Deductibles will transfer, possibly even to a new insurer (which is fairly unique; we aren’t aware of this elsewhere, other than the two Michigan insurers that are offering it). But additional out-of-pocket spending will not transfer to the new plan.

States where the official word is that ‘it depends’

Several states have addressed accumulator transfers so that consumers know to be aware of them, but are leaving the decision up to the insurers. In these states (listed below), some or all of the insurers may be offering accumulator transfers, but consumers should definitely ask their insurer how this will work before making the decision to switch plans.

  • Connecticut
  • Massachusetts
  • Nevada
  • New Hampshire
  • Ohio
  • Montana
  • North Dakota — the ND Insurance Department is recommending that consumers reach out to their insurance company to see how this is being handled.
  • Pennsylvania
  • Rhode Island – There are two insurers that offer plans in Rhode Island’s marketplace; one has agreed to transfer accumulators and one has not, but the marketplace is still working to address this and it’s possible both insurers could end up allowing accumulators to transfer.
  • Washington

States where the official word is that accumulators will not transfer

Some states have fairly clearly indicated that insurers will not transfer accumulators if policyholders make a plan change. But even in these states, it’s still worth checking with a specific insurer to see what approach they’re taking, as some are still developing their approach during this unique time.

What if my state’s not listed?

Insurance departments in the rest of the states haven’t put out any official guidance or bulletins regarding accumulator transfers, although these may still be forthcoming as the COVID/ARP window progresses. Keep in mind that it will be July in most states before the ARP’s benefits are available for people receiving unemployment compensation in 2021, so this is still very much a work in progress and likely to evolve over time.

States that have not yet issued specific guidance or clarified insurers positions on accumulator transfers include:

  • Alabama
  • Arizona
  • Arkansas
  • Delaware
  • Florida
  • Georgia
  • Hawaii
  • Indiana
  • Iowa
  • Kansas
  • Kentucky
  • Louisiana
  • Maine
  • Mississippi
  • Missouri
  • Nebraska
  • North Carolina
  • Oklahoma
  • Oregon
  • South Carolina
  • South Dakota
  • Texas
  • Utah
  • Wyoming

If you’re in one of these states, your insurer may or may not be transferring accumulators when enrollees switch to a new plan in 2021. If you’ve had significant out-of-pocket medical spending so far this year, be sure to reach out to your insurer to see how they’re handling this. And if a representative tells you that accumulators will transfer, it’s a good idea to get confirmation in writing.

And if your insurer initially says no, keep asking over the coming days and weeks. We’ve seen some insurers start to offer accumulator transfers after initially stating that they didn’t plan to do so, and it’s possible that other insurers might follow suit.

To switch or not to switch?

So what should you do if you’ve already spent some money out-of-pocket this year, and you’re going to have to start over at $0 on a new plan?

Maybe you’re enrolled in a grandmothered or grandfathered plan and your insurer simply doesn’t offer plans for sale in the marketplace. Depending on where you live, this might also be the case if you have an ACA-compliant off-exchange plan, as not all off-exchange insurers sell plans in the exchange. And as noted above, it might also be the case even if you want to transfer from one ACA-compliant plan to another. (But check with both the insurer and the insurance department in your state before giving up on accumulator transfers in that situation.)

Really, it just comes down to the math: Will the amount you’re going to save due to premium tax credit (and possibly cost-sharing reductions, if you’re eligible for them and switching to a Silver plan) offset the loss you’ll take by having to start over at $0 on your deductible and out-of-pocket exposure? If you haven’t spent much this year, the answer is probably Yes. If you’ve already met your maximum out-of-pocket for the year, it’s probably going to be a tougher decision.

But don’t assume that it’s not worth your while. Depending on the circumstances (especially if you were previously impacted by the “subsidy cliff” and are newly eligible for subsidies), your new subsidies might be worth more than you’d be giving up by having to start over with new out-of-pocket costs.

And if you’re part of the way toward meeting your deductible on a Bronze plan and are newly eligible for a free or very low-cost Silver plan that includes cost-sharing reductions, you might find that the new plan ultimately saves you money in out-of-pocket costs for the rest of the year, even if your accumulators don’t transfer.

Louise Norris is an individual health insurance broker who has been writing about health insurance and health reform since 2006. She has written dozens of opinions and educational pieces about the Affordable Care Act for healthinsurance.org. Her state health insurance marketplace updates are regularly cited by media who cover health reform and by other health insurance experts.

The post Are accumulators making you think twice about switching health plans? appeared first on healthinsurance.org.

American Rescue Plan drives health insurance costs down for ‘young invincibles’

For generations, one of the transition points for young adults has been the process of leaving their parents’ health insurance and enrolling in their own coverage (assuming they were fortunate enough to be covered under a parent’s health plan in the first place).

The Affordable Care Act (ACA) ushered in some important changes that made coverage much more accessible for young adults, including the provision that allows them to remain on a parent’s health plan until age 26. Now, the American Rescue Plan (ARP) is making coverage even more affordable, albeit temporarily.

For 2021 and 2022, the ARP provides enhanced premium subsidies (aka premium tax credits). And in most cases, those who are receiving unemployment compensation at any point in 2021 are eligible for premium-free coverage that includes robust cost-sharing reductions.

By the time they need to secure their own coverage, some young adults already have access to their own employer’s health plan. But what if you don’t? Maybe you’re working for a small business that doesn’t offer coverage, or striving to fulfill your entrepreneurial dreams, or working multiple part-time jobs. Let’s take a look at your options for obtaining your own health coverage, and the points you should consider when you’re working through this process:

Individual-market plans more affordable than ever

Purchasing an individual plan in the marketplace has always been an option for young adults, and the ACA ensures that coverage is guaranteed-issue, regardless of a person’s medical history (that is, you can’t be denied coverage or charged a higher premium due to a pre-existing medical condition). The ACA also created premium subsidies that make coverage more affordable than it would otherwise be. But the ARP has increased the size of those subsidies for 2021 and 2022.

Previously, healthy young people with limited income sometimes found themselves having to make a tough choice between a plan with a very low (or free) premium and very high out-of-pocket costs, versus a plan with more manageable out-of-pocket costs but a not-insignificant monthly premium. In some circumstances, the new subsidy structure under the ARP helps to eliminate this tough decision by reducing premiums for the more robust coverage.

How much can ‘young invincibles’ save on coverage?

The exact amount of a buyer’s subsidy will depend on how old they are and where they live. But some examples will help to illustrate how the ARP’s subsidy enhancements make coverage more affordable and allow young people to enroll in more robust health plans:

Let’s say you’re about to turn 26, you live in Chicago, and you expect to earn $18,000 this year working at two part-time jobs – neither of which offer health insurance benefits. You’re losing coverage under your parents’ health plan at the end of June, and need to get your own plan in place for July.

  • According to HealthCare.gov’s plan comparison tool, the benchmark plan in that area has a full-price cost of about $277/month for a 26-year-old.
  • Under the normal rules (ie, before the American Rescue Plan), the after-subsidy amount for the benchmark plan would be about $54/month. (That’s 3.59% of the person’s $18,000 income. Here’s the math on how that’s all determined.)
  • Under the American Rescue Plan, that policy is free at this income level. Zero premium. It’s got a $200 deductible, $5 copays for primary care visits and generic drugs, and an $800 out-of-pocket maximum. These robust benefits are thanks to the built-in cost-sharing reductions. (Note that this option –a $0 premium plan with robust cost-sharing reductions – is also available if you’re receiving unemployment compensation in 2021, regardless of your total income.)

Those cost-sharing reductions are always available. But without the American Rescue Plan, a healthy 26-year-old might have been tempted to get one of the less-expensive Bronze plans. (In this particular case, one plan was available for under $2/month, and others were available for under $30/month.) But those come with deductibles of at least $7,400, and out-of-pocket maximums of $8,550. (Cost-sharing reductions are only available on Silver plans. The benchmark plan is always a Silver plan, and its price is used to determine the amount of a person’s subsidy.)

A young, healthy person with a limited income might have enrolled in that $2/month plan because the premiums fit their budget. But they would likely have struggled to pay the out-of-pocket costs if they experienced a significant medical event during the year. Thanks to the expanded premium subsidies created by the ARP, there’s no longer a tough decision to make, since the benchmark plan, with robust cost-sharing reductions, has a $0 premium for people with income up to 150% of the federal poverty level (for a single person, that’s $19,140 in 2021).

Although the dollar amounts of the ARP’s subsidy increases are larger for older people (because their pre-subsidy premiums are so much higher), it’s really significant that the new law helps to make it easier for “young invincibles” with limited incomes to enroll in plans with cost-sharing reductions. The Bronze plans that come with much higher out-of-pocket costs won’t be such an appealing alternative when Silver plans are made much more affordable – or free, as in the case we just looked at.

What about young people with higher incomes?

But what if you’re a young person with an income that’s too high for cost-sharing reductions? The American Rescue Plan still makes coverage more affordable, and makes it easier to afford a better-quality plan. Let’s say our 26-year-old in Chicago is earning $40,000 in 2021 – about 313% of the federal poverty level.

  • The benchmark plan is still $277/month without any premium subsidies.
  • Without the American Rescue Plan, no subsidies are available for this person at this income level (despite the fact that their income is under 400% of the poverty level). The benchmark plan is $277/month and the cheapest available plan is $215/month (it’s a Bronze plan with a $7,400 deductible, $60 primary care copays, and an out-of-pocket cap of $8,550).
  • Under the American Rescue Plan, this person would be eligible for a premium subsidy that would reduce the cost of the benchmark (Silver) plan to $211/month (because the percentage of income that people are expected to spend on the benchmark plan has been reduced). The lowest-cost plan would drop to about $149/month.

The take-away here? Buying your own health insurance is much more affordable in 2021 and 2022 than it would normally be. Depending on your income, you might be eligible for robust health coverage with $0 premiums, or you might be eligible for premium subsidies even if you weren’t prior to the American Rescue Plan.

Switching to your own plan: Things to keep in mind

If you’re switching to your own self-purchased health insurance plan after having coverage under a parent’s health plan, there are several things to be aware of as you make this change, particularly if your previous health coverage was offered by an employer:

  • You may have far more plan options than you and your family are used to having. If your parents’ plan is offered by an employer, it’s likely one of only a few options from which they can choose each year. But when you’re shopping for your own coverage in the individual market, you might see dozens of available plans. If the plan selection process feels overwhelming, here are some considerations to keep in mind as you go about picking a plan.
  • There might not be any PPO options. PPOs, which provide some coverage for out-of-network services and also tend to have broader provider networks, are widely available in the employer-sponsored market. But they tend to be much less available in the individual market. When you’re shopping for your own coverage, you’re more likely to encounter plans that only cover care received in-network. This makes it particularly important to understand what doctors and facilities are in-network before you enroll.
  • The provider network might be very different, even if the health insurance company is the same one you had before. For example, your parents’ plan might be provided or administered by Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield, and you might decide to enroll in a marketplace plan offered by the same insurer. But most insurers have different provider networks for their individual and group health plans, so you’ll want to double-check to see if your medical providers are in-network with the plans you’re considering.

Low income? Medicaid may be an option

If you’re in Washington, DC or one of the 36 states (soon to be 38) where Medicaid eligibility was expanded as a result of the ACA, you might find that you’re eligible for Medicaid. For a single person in the continental U.S., Medicaid eligibility extends to an annual income of $17,774 in 2021. (It’s higher in Alaska and Hawaii, and DC also has a higher eligibility limit, allowing people to enroll in Medicaid with an income as high as $25,760.)

Medicaid eligibility is also based on current monthly income, meaning you won’t need to project your total annual income the way you do for premium subsidy eligibility. In a state that has expanded Medicaid eligibility under the ACA, a single individual can qualify for Medicaid with a monthly income of up to $1,482 in 2021. So if you’re going through a time period when your income is lower than normal, Medicaid can be a great safety net.

In most cases, Medicaid has no monthly premiums, and out-of-pocket costs are generally much lower than they would be with a private insurance plan.

In Minnesota and New York, Basic Health Program coverage is also available. These plans have modest premiums and provide robust health coverage. They’re available to people who earn too much for Medicaid but no more than 200% of the poverty level (which amounts to $25,520 for a single person in 2021).

COBRA: Access remains unchanged, but might be expensive

If you’re aging off your parents’ health plan, COBRA or mini-COBRA (state continuation coverage) might be available. This can be a good option if you’re able to afford it, as it allows you to keep the same coverage you already have for up to 18 additional months. You won’t have to start over with a new plan’s deductible and out-of-pocket maximum, nor will you need to worry about switching to a different provider network or selecting a plan with a different covered drug list.

The American Rescue Plan provides a one-time six-month federal subsidy that pays 100% of COBRA premiums, but this is only available to people who are eligible for COBRA due to an involuntary job loss of involuntary reduction in hours, and it’s only available through September 2020.

Aging off a parent’s health plan is a qualifying event that will allow you to continue your coverage via COBRA (assuming it’s available), but it’s not an event that will trigger the COBRA subsidy. (The details for in ARP Section 9501(a)(1)(B)(i), which references other existing statutes, all of which pertain to people who lose their jobs or have their hours reduced; the legislation notes that this must be involuntary in order to trigger the subsidies).

So depending on the circumstances, it may make more sense to switch to an individual plan in the marketplace.

Student health plans: Most are compliant with the ACA

If you’re in school and eligible for a student health plan, this might be an affordable and convenient option. Thanks to the ACA, nearly all student health plans are much more robust than they used to be, and provide coverage that follows all of the same rules that apply to individual market plans.

Check with your school to see if coverage is offered, and if so, whether it’s compliant with the ACA (some self-insured student health plans have opted to avoid ACA-compliance; if your school offers one of these plans, make sure you understand what types of medical care might not be covered under the plan).

If you do have an option to enroll in a high-quality student health plan, you’ll want to compare that with the other available options, including self-purchased individual market coverage, or remaining on a parent’s plan if you’re under 26 and that option is available to you.

Louise Norris is an individual health insurance broker who has been writing about health insurance and health reform since 2006. She has written dozens of opinions and educational pieces about the Affordable Care Act for healthinsurance.org. Her state health exchange updates are regularly cited by media who cover health reform and by other health insurance experts.

The post American Rescue Plan drives health insurance costs down for ‘young invincibles’ appeared first on healthinsurance.org.

Five ways the American Rescue Plan might slash your health insurance costs

If you’re among the millions of Americans who are uninsured or who buy their own health insurance in the individual market, the American Rescue Plan (ARP) has just significantly changed the rules – and changed them in a way that likely improve your access to affordable comprehensive health insurance.

Thanks to the legislation – signed last week by President Biden – premium subsidies are larger and available to more people in 2021 and 2022. Many people who are receiving unemployment compensation in 2021 can now qualify for premium-free health insurance that provides robust benefits. And people who received excess premium subsidies in 2020 do not have to repay that money to the IRS when they file their 2020 tax return.

These improvements – although temporary and part of a massive bill designed to help the country recover from the COVID pandemic – will make it much easier for people to afford high-quality health insurance. But they’ve also generated a great deal of questions and confusion, especially among people who wonder whether they need to reconsider the plan choice they already made for 2021.

And the timing of these changes coincides neatly with a COVID-related enrollment period available nationwide. In most states, it continues through May 15, and in most states it’s an opportunity for people to newly enroll or switch from one plan to another, with coverage that takes effect the month after you enroll.

Should you use this window to enroll or make a plan change now that the ARP has been enacted? It depends, although you’ll definitely want to at least take another look at your coverage options. Here are some of the most common scenarios – and questions that people should be asking about them – right now:

1. You’re enrolled in an off-exchange ACA-compliant plan

Off-exchange plans are essentially the same as on-exchange plans, but people purchase them directly from the insurance company instead of going through the health insurance marketplace. If you know for sure that you’re not eligible for a premium subsidy, it’s fine to be enrolled off-exchange. But if you might be subsidy-eligible, the only way to get that subsidy – either upfront or claimed later on your tax return – is to enroll through the exchange.

Thanks to the American Rescue Plan, applicants with household incomes above 400% of the federal poverty level – who were previously ineligible for a subsidy – may find that they now qualify for a subsidy. And depending on where they live and how old they are, the subsidy could be substantial.

If you’re enrolled off-exchange, it’s definitely in your best interest to check out the on-exchange options and see if you’d qualify for a subsidy under the new rules.

If you’re in a state that uses HealthCare.gov, the new subsidies and premium amounts will be available for browsing as of April 1. (The 15 state-run marketplaces are working on this as well, and will display the new subsidy amounts as soon as possible.) But CMS has clarified that people should still enroll by the end of March in order to have coverage April 1, and then come back to the marketplace after the beginning of April to activate the new subsidies. (Applications submitted before April 1 will only have the current, pre-ARP subsidies built-in, although enrollees would then still be able to collect the full subsidy amount when they file their 2021 tax returns).

If you’re enrolled off-exchange and planning to switch to the on-exchange version of your current plan, your insurer might be willing to transition any accumulated out-of-pocket expenses you may have incurred thus-far this year. But this is not required; you’ll want to reach out to your insurer to see if this is something they’d allow.

Depending on where you live and the plan you’ve selected, the same plan (with the same medical provider network) may or may not be available on-exchange. And if you’re switching to a different policy on-exchange, your out-of-pocket spending will reset to $0 on the new plan.

So switching to an on-exchange plan is not necessarily the best option for everyone – it will depend on plan availability, provider networks, how much you’ve spent out-of-pocket already this year, and how much your premium subsidy will be if you enroll in a plan through the exchange.

2. You’re enrolled in a health plan that’s not ACA-compliant

Right now, you may have coverage through a short-term health insurance plan, a health care sharing ministry plan, a fixed indemnity plan, a direct primary care membership, a Farm Bureau plan, or a grandmothered or grandfathered health plan. Chances are, you’ve chosen this option because the monthly premiums fit into your budget, and ACA-compliant health coverage did not – at least as of the last time you checked. But it’s time to check again.

Healthy people with income above 400% of the poverty level have long been drawn to these alternative types of coverage, as have some people with incomes a little under 400% of the poverty level who only qualified for fairly small premium subsidies. But for 2021 and 2022, as a result of the ARP, the subsidies are much larger and there’s no longer a subsidy cliff.

So before the current COVID-related enrollment window ends (May 15 in most states), you’ll want to check out your marketplace options. You might be pleasantly surprised to see that you can get comprehensive ACA-compliant health insurance – at least for this year and next year – at a much lower premium than you might have seen the last time you checked. (Again, note that if you’re browsing plan options before April 1 in most states, you won’t yet be able to see the more robust premium subsidies. But you’ll still be able to claim them on your 2021 tax return for any months in 2021 that you were enrolled.)

3. You’re enrolled in a Bronze plan through the exchange

If you’re currently enrolled in a Bronze plan through the exchange, you may have picked it because the premiums were lower than Silver, Gold or Platinum coverage options. Your Bronze plan may have been entirely free after your subsidy was applied.

You’ll still have a low (or free) premium under the ARP, but it’s in your best interest to actively compare it to the other available options during the current COVID-related enrollment period. You may find that you can now qualify for a very low-cost – or maybe free – Silver plan, which would have more robust benefits than your Bronze plan. This is especially true if you’re eligible for cost-sharing reductions (CSR), as these are essentially a free upgrade on your health coverage benefits. (CSR benefits are available in 2021 to a single individual earning up to $31,900, and to a family of four earning up to $65,500. These amounts are higher in Alaska and Hawaii.)

Before you make a plan switch, however, you’ll want to pay attention to the maximum out-of-pocket limits for the plans at a higher metal level. If you’re not eligible for CSR (ie, your income is above 250% of the poverty level), you might find that the available Silver plans have out-of-pocket limits that are similar to what you have with your Bronze plan. Depending on how you anticipate using your plan during the year, it may or may not make sense to pay a higher premium to upgrade your coverage.

If you anticipate high claims costs that will result in hitting the out-of-pocket maximum regardless of what plan you have, you might not come out ahead with an upgraded plan, once you account for your total out-of-pocket costs and premiums. But if you rarely have medical needs, the upgraded plan might save you money via a lower deductible and lower copays for things like office visits and prescription drugs.

As always, take all of the factors into consideration: Total premiums, out-of-pocket maximum, and how the plan might cover your medical costs if you don’t expect to meet that out-of-pocket maximum during the year.

If you picked a Bronze plan because you wanted to contribute to a health savings account (HSA) and needed to enroll in an HSA-qualified high-deductible health plan (HDHP), it’s worth checking to see if there are any HDHPs available in your area at a higher metal level. While it’s common to see Bronze HDHPs, there are also Silver and even Gold HDHPs in many areas. With the new subsidies created by the ARP, you might find that you can still maintain your HSA eligibility while also having a health plan with lower out-of-pocket costs that doesn’t cost you too much more in monthly premiums.

4. You’ve lost, or will soon lose, your job — and your health coverage

If you recently lost or will soon lose your job – and your health insurance – you’ve got some decisions to make. You might have access to COBRA or state continuation coverage (mini-COBRA), and you’ll also have access to a special enrollment period during which you can sign up for an individual/family health plan.

Under ARP Section 9501, the government will cover the full premium costs for COBRA or mini-COBRA from April 1 through September 30, 2021. (Note that this is not available if you voluntarily left your job.)

If you were laid off (or experienced an involuntary reduction in hours that resulted in a loss of health coverage) any time in the last 18 months and were COBRA-eligible but either declined it or later terminated it, you can opt back into COBRA in order to take advantage of the new subsidy. However, the subsidy does not extend your initial COBRA termination date, which is still, in most cases, 18 months after your COBRA would have begun if you had opted in from the start. So if you were first eligible for COBRA on October 1, 2019, your COBRA and your COBRA subsidy will end on April 30, 2021 (ie, 18 months later). This also applies to state continuation plans, which are often shorter in length than COBRA

If you’re receiving unemployment compensation at any point this year, you’ll also be eligible for a $0 premium Silver plan in the marketplace, with the most robust level of cost-sharing reductions. (CMS has clarified that it might take a while to get the details of this programmed into HealthCare.gov, but enrollees will be able to log back into their accounts later in the year to activate the larger subsidies, and there’s always the option to just claim them on your tax return after the end of the year.)

So should you take the fully subsidized COBRA coverage or the fully subsidized marketplace plan? It depends, but there are several factors to consider:

  • If you elect COBRA, what’s your plan for the final quarter of the year? Would you be able to pay full price once the government subsidy ends?
  • We don’t yet have federal guidance on whether the end of the government-funded COBRA subsidies will trigger a special enrollment period for marketplace plans, although we assume that it will. (The end of employer subsidies for COBRA does trigger a special enrollment period.) But assuming it does, would you want to switch to a marketplace plan at that point?
  • If you’ve incurred out-of-pocket costs under your employer’s plan thus far in 2021, COBRA might be the better choice, as you won’t have to start over on the out-of-pocket costs for a new plan. But you’ll still want to consider what you’ll do after September, and whether it will be more cost-effective to pay full price for COBRA for the final months of the year, or start over with a new plan at that point.
  • If you opt to switch to a marketplace plan, pay close attention to the provider networks and covered drug lists. Even if the marketplace plan is issued by the same insurance company that provides or administers your employer’s plan, the benefits and provider network might be quite different on the individual/family plan.

If you’re already enrolled in a marketplace plan and you’re receiving or have received unemployment compensation this year, you’ll want to take a close look at your coverage options. If you’re currently enrolled in a Bronze plan, be sure to check out the $0 premium Silver plan with robust cost-sharing reductions that may be available to you under the ARP, due to your unemployment compensation in 2021.

5. You’re already enrolled in the marketplace and happy with your plan

About 15% of current marketplace enrollees pay full price for their coverage, usually because they earn more than 400% of the poverty level and thus aren’t subsidy-eligible. But if you’re in this group, you may be eligible for a subsidy under the ARP.

Millions of other marketplace enrollees are receiving premium subsidies, and although their available subsidy amounts are likely to be larger under the ARP, they may not want to make any changes to their coverage.

If you’re already enrolled in a marketplace plan and certain that your current plan is the best option for your circumstances, you don’t need to do anything at all. If you qualify for an additional premium subsidy amount, it will be retroactive to January 2021 and you’ll be able to claim it when you file your 2021 taxes.

But you may want to log back into your marketplace account and claim your new or additional subsidy amount, so that it can be paid to your insurer on your behalf each month for the rest of 2021.

If you’re in a state that uses HealthCare.gov, CMS has confirmed that the premium subsidy amounts will not automatically update (the 15 state-run marketplaces will have their own protocols for how this is handled). So you’ll need to return to the marketplace to provide proof of your income (if you’re currently enrolled in a full-price plan and never gave your income details to the marketplace) or reselect your current plan and trigger the new subsidies.

Louise Norris is an individual health insurance broker who has been writing about health insurance and health reform since 2006. She has written dozens of opinions and educational pieces about the Affordable Care Act for healthinsurance.org. Her state health exchange updates are regularly cited by media who cover health reform and by other health insurance experts.

The post Five ways the American Rescue Plan might slash your health insurance costs appeared first on healthinsurance.org.

How the American Rescue Plan Act would boost marketplace premium subsidies

Key takeaways

Last weekend, the House of Representatives passed the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (H.R. 1319), an economic stimulus package designed to provide relief from the impact of COVID-19 on Americans. The bill has the support of the majority of Americans – including those registered as Republicans and Independents.

H.R. 1319 is now under consideration in the Senate, so we don’t yet know exactly what will be included in the final legislation. But the health insurance provisions in the House version of the legislation are unchanged from what the House Ways and Means Committee had initially proposed, and have not been sticking points for the bill thus far.

Several provisions in H.R. 1319 are designed to make health coverage more accessible and affordable. Today we’re taking a look at how the legislation would change the ACA’s premium subsidy structure for 2021 and 2022, and the impact that would have on the premiums that Americans pay for individual and family health coverage.

Help for 12 million marketplace enrollees, plus more who will newly enroll

If you’re among the 12 million people who purchase ACA-compliant coverage in the health insurance marketplaces, your coverage is likely to become more affordable under H.R. 1319.

What’s more, the Congressional Budget Office estimates that an additional 1.7 million people – most of whom are currently uninsured – would enroll in health plans through the marketplaces in 2022 as a result of the enhanced premium subsidies.

No one would pay more than 8.5% of their income for the benchmark plan

Some opponents of the legislation have criticized its premium subsidy enhancements as a handout to wealthy Americans. But that’s only because the legislation is designed to remedy the subsidy cliff – which can result in some households paying as much as half of their annual income for health insurance premiums. It’s a situation that’s obviously neither realistic nor sustainable for policyholders.

The Affordable Care Act (ACA) only provides premium tax credits (aka premium subsidies) if a household’s ACA-specific modified adjusted gross income doesn’t exceed 400 percent of the federal poverty level. For 2021 coverage in the continental U.S., that’s about $51,000 for a single person and $104,800 for a family of four. Depending on where you live, that might be a comfortable income – but not if you have to spend 20, 30, 40 or even 50 percent of that income on health insurance.

H.R. 1319’s adjustment to the premium tax credit guidelines would temporarily – for this year and next year – eliminate the income cap for premium subsidies. That means that – regardless of income – no one would have to pay more than 8.5 percent of their household income for the benchmark plan (the second-lowest-cost Silver plan available in the exchange in a given area).

Under this approach, subsidies would phase out gradually as income increases. Plan buyers would not be eligible for a subsidy if the benchmark plan’s full price wouldn’t be more than 8.5 percent of the household’s income. But in some areas of the country – and particularly for older applicants, who can be charged as much as three times the premiums young adults pay – premium subsidy eligibility could end up extending well above 400 percent of the poverty level.

In addition to addressing the subsidy cliff, H.R. 1319 also enhances premium subsidies for marketplace buyers who are already subsidy-eligible. The subsidies would get larger across the board, making after-subsidy premiums more affordable for most enrollees. At every income level, the legislation would reduce the percentage of income that people are expected to pay for the benchmark plan, which would result in larger subsidies.

Larger subsidies? Here are a few examples.

How much larger? It would depend on location, income, and age. Let’s take a look at some examples.

We’ll consider applicants with various income levels and ages in three locations: Albuquerque, New Mexico – where premiums are among the nation’s lowest; Jackson, Mississippi – where premiums are close to the national average; and Cheyenne, Wyoming – where premiums are among the nation’s highest.

In each location, we’ll see how things would play out for a 25-year-old, a 60-year-old, and a family of four (45-year-old parents, and kids who are 13 and 10), all at varying income levels.

American Rescue Plan Act impact on health insurance subsidiesYou can see the full comparison in this spreadsheet. (Current premiums were obtained via HealthCare.gov’s browsing tool. Premiums under H.R. 1319 were calculated using the proposed applicable percentage table in Section 9661(a) and the methodology outlined here, which would be unchanged under the new legislation.)

In most cases, you’ll notice that the subsidy amount is larger under H.R. 1319, resulting in a lower benchmark premium and also a lower price for the lowest-cost plan available to that applicant (or more plans available with no premium at all). This is because the new legislation specifically reduces the percentage of income that people have to pay for the benchmark plan. That, in turn, drives up the subsidy amounts that are necessary to reduce the benchmark premium. And since premium subsidies can be applied to any metal-level plan, it also results in a lower cost for the other available plans (or more premium-free plans, depending on the circumstances).

As you consider these numbers, note that if the current subsidy amount is $0, either the benchmark plan is already considered affordable for that person, or their income is over 400 percent of the poverty level and subsidies are simply not available. If the subsidy amount is $0 under the H.R. 1319 scenario, it means that the benchmark plan would not cost more than 8.5 percent of the applicant’s income.

As you can see, the additional subsidies would be widely available, but would be more substantial for people who are currently paying the highest premiums. Under the current rules, it may not be realistic for our Wyoming family to pay more than $30,000 in annual premiums (enrolling in the benchmark plan, with premiums in excess of $2,500 per month). The American Rescue Plan Act would bring their annual premiums for the benchmark plan down to under $10,000, which is much more manageable.

The legislation is not, however, a giveaway to wealthy Americans. If that family earned $500,000, they still wouldn’t get a premium subsidy under H.R. 1319, because even at $2,528/month, the full-price cost of the benchmark plan would only amount to 6 percent of their income. Unlike Medicare and the tax breaks for employer-sponsored health insurance, financial assistance with individual market health insurance would not extend to the wealthiest applicants.

By capping premiums at 8.5 percent of income, H.R. 1319 provides targeted premium assistance only where it’s needed. And by enhancing the existing premium subsidies, the legislation makes it easier for people at all income levels to afford health coverage.

Premium enhancements would be retroactive but also temporary

Assuming these premium subsidy enhancements are approved by the Senate, they’ll be retroactive to the start of 2021. Current enrollees will be able to start claiming any applicable extra subsidy immediately, or they can wait and claim it on their 2021 tax return. The additional premium subsidies would also be available for 2022, but would no longer be available as of 2023 unless additional legislation is enacted to extend them.

And there’s currently a special enrollment period – which continues through May 15 in most states – during which people can sign up for coverage if they haven’t already. In most states, this window can also be used by people who already have coverage and wish to change their plan, so this is definitely a good time to reconsider your health insurance coverage and make sure you’re taking advantage of the benefits that are available to you.

Louise Norris is an individual health insurance broker who has been writing about health insurance and health reform since 2006. She has written dozens of opinions and educational pieces about the Affordable Care Act for healthinsurance.org. Her state health exchange updates are regularly cited by media who cover health reform and by other health insurance experts.

The post How the American Rescue Plan Act would boost marketplace premium subsidies appeared first on healthinsurance.org.

How the American Rescue Plan Act will boost marketplace premium subsidies

Key takeaways

Edit: The Senate passed H.R.1319 on March 6, and the House passed the bill again on March 10. President Biden signed it into law on March 11. CMS published some initial information for marketplace enrollees on March 12.

Last weekend, the House of Representatives passed the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (H.R. 1319), an economic stimulus package designed to provide relief from the impact of COVID-19 on Americans. The bill has the support of the majority of Americans – including those registered as Republicans and Independents.

H.R. 1319 is now under consideration in the Senate, so we don’t yet know exactly what will be included in the final legislation. But the health insurance provisions in the House version of the legislation are unchanged from what the House Ways and Means Committee had initially proposed, and have not been sticking points for the bill thus far.

Several provisions in H.R. 1319 are designed to make health coverage more accessible and affordable. Today we’re taking a look at how the legislation would change the ACA’s premium subsidy structure for 2021 and 2022, and the impact that would have on the premiums that Americans pay for individual and family health coverage.

Help for 12 million marketplace enrollees, plus more who will newly enroll

If you’re among the 12 million people who purchase ACA-compliant coverage in the health insurance marketplaces, your coverage is likely to become more affordable under H.R. 1319.

What’s more, the Congressional Budget Office estimates that an additional 1.7 million people – most of whom are currently uninsured – would enroll in health plans through the marketplaces in 2022 as a result of the enhanced premium subsidies.

No one would pay more than 8.5% of their income for the benchmark plan

Some opponents of the legislation have criticized its premium subsidy enhancements as a handout to wealthy Americans. But that’s only because the legislation is designed to remedy the subsidy cliff – which can result in some households paying as much as half of their annual income for health insurance premiums. It’s a situation that’s obviously neither realistic nor sustainable for policyholders.

The Affordable Care Act (ACA) only provides premium tax credits (aka premium subsidies) if a household’s ACA-specific modified adjusted gross income doesn’t exceed 400 percent of the federal poverty level. For 2021 coverage in the continental U.S., that’s about $51,000 for a single person and $104,800 for a family of four. Depending on where you live, that might be a comfortable income – but not if you have to spend 20, 30, 40 or even 50 percent of that income on health insurance.

H.R. 1319’s adjustment to the premium tax credit guidelines would temporarily – for this year and next year – eliminate the income cap for premium subsidies. That means that – regardless of income – no one would have to pay more than 8.5 percent of their household income for the benchmark plan (the second-lowest-cost Silver plan available in the exchange in a given area).

Under this approach, subsidies would phase out gradually as income increases. Plan buyers would not be eligible for a subsidy if the benchmark plan’s full price wouldn’t be more than 8.5 percent of the household’s income. But in some areas of the country – and particularly for older applicants, who can be charged as much as three times the premiums young adults pay – premium subsidy eligibility could end up extending well above 400 percent of the poverty level.

In addition to addressing the subsidy cliff, H.R. 1319 also enhances premium subsidies for marketplace buyers who are already subsidy-eligible. The subsidies would get larger across the board, making after-subsidy premiums more affordable for most enrollees. At every income level, the legislation would reduce the percentage of income that people are expected to pay for the benchmark plan, which would result in larger subsidies.

Larger subsidies? Here are a few examples.

How much larger? It would depend on location, income, and age. Let’s take a look at some examples.

We’ll consider applicants with various income levels and ages in three locations: Albuquerque, New Mexico – where premiums are among the nation’s lowest; Jackson, Mississippi – where premiums are close to the national average; and Cheyenne, Wyoming – where premiums are among the nation’s highest.

In each location, we’ll see how things would play out for a 25-year-old, a 60-year-old, and a family of four (45-year-old parents, and kids who are 13 and 10), all at varying income levels.

American Rescue Plan Act impact on health insurance subsidiesYou can see the full comparison in this spreadsheet. (Current premiums were obtained via HealthCare.gov’s browsing tool. Premiums under H.R. 1319 were calculated using the proposed applicable percentage table in Section 9661(a) and the methodology outlined here, which would be unchanged under the new legislation.)

In most cases, you’ll notice that the subsidy amount is larger under H.R. 1319, resulting in a lower benchmark premium and also a lower price for the lowest-cost plan available to that applicant (or more plans available with no premium at all). This is because the new legislation specifically reduces the percentage of income that people have to pay for the benchmark plan. That, in turn, drives up the subsidy amounts that are necessary to reduce the benchmark premium. And since premium subsidies can be applied to any metal-level plan, it also results in a lower cost for the other available plans (or more premium-free plans, depending on the circumstances).

As you consider these numbers, note that if the current subsidy amount is $0, either the benchmark plan is already considered affordable for that person, or their income is over 400 percent of the poverty level and subsidies are simply not available. If the subsidy amount is $0 under the H.R. 1319 scenario, it means that the benchmark plan would not cost more than 8.5 percent of the applicant’s income.

As you can see, the additional subsidies would be widely available, but would be more substantial for people who are currently paying the highest premiums. Under the current rules, it may not be realistic for our Wyoming family to pay more than $30,000 in annual premiums (enrolling in the benchmark plan, with premiums in excess of $2,500 per month). The American Rescue Plan Act would bring their annual premiums for the benchmark plan down to under $10,000, which is much more manageable.

The legislation is not, however, a giveaway to wealthy Americans. If that family earned $500,000, they still wouldn’t get a premium subsidy under H.R. 1319, because even at $2,528/month, the full-price cost of the benchmark plan would only amount to 6 percent of their income. Unlike Medicare and the tax breaks for employer-sponsored health insurance, financial assistance with individual market health insurance would not extend to the wealthiest applicants.

By capping premiums at 8.5 percent of income, H.R. 1319 provides targeted premium assistance only where it’s needed. And by enhancing the existing premium subsidies, the legislation makes it easier for people at all income levels to afford health coverage.

Premium enhancements would be retroactive but also temporary

Assuming these premium subsidy enhancements are approved by the Senate, they’ll be retroactive to the start of 2021. Current enrollees will be able to start claiming any applicable extra subsidy immediately, or they can wait and claim it on their 2021 tax return. The additional premium subsidies would also be available for 2022, but would no longer be available as of 2023 unless additional legislation is enacted to extend them.

And there’s currently a special enrollment period – which continues through May 15 in most states – during which people can sign up for coverage if they haven’t already. In most states, this window can also be used by people who already have coverage and wish to change their plan, so this is definitely a good time to reconsider your health insurance coverage and make sure you’re taking advantage of the benefits that are available to you.

Louise Norris is an individual health insurance broker who has been writing about health insurance and health reform since 2006. She has written dozens of opinions and educational pieces about the Affordable Care Act for healthinsurance.org. Her state health exchange updates are regularly cited by media who cover health reform and by other health insurance experts.

The post How the American Rescue Plan Act will boost marketplace premium subsidies appeared first on healthinsurance.org.

What happens if my income changes and my premium subsidy is too big? Will I have to repay it?

Q: What happens if my income changes and my premium subsidy is too big? Will I have to repay it?

Obamacare subsidy calculator

Use our calculator to estimate how much you could save on your ACA-compliant health insurance premiums.

A: Monthly premium subsidy amounts (ie, the advance premium tax credit – APTC – that’s paid to your insurer each month to offset the cost of your premium) are estimated based on prior-year income and projections for the year ahead, but the actual premium tax credit amount to which you’re entitled depends on your actual income in the year that you’re getting subsidized health insurance coverage.

If recipients end up earning more than anticipated, they could have to pay back some of the subsidy. This can catch people off guard, especially since the tax credits are paid directly to the insurance carriers each month, but if overpaid, they must be returned by the insureds themselves.

The issue of reconciling APTCs was explained in a 2013 IRS publication (see the final column on page 30383, continued on page 30384) which clearly explains that they do expect people to pay back subsidies that are in excess of the actual amount for which the household qualifies.

But the portion of an excess subsidy that must be repaid is capped for families with incomes up to 400 percent of federal poverty level (FPL). Details regarding the maximum amount that must be repaid, depending on income, are in the instructions for Form 8962, on Table 5 (Repayment Limitation). These amounts are adjusted annually, but for the 2020 tax year, the repayment caps range from $325 to $2,700, depending on your income and your tax filing status (single filer versus any other filing status). GOP lawmakers considered various proposals in 2017 that would have eliminated the repayment limitations, essentially requiring anyone who received excess APTC to pay back the full amount, regardless of income. But those proposals were not enacted.

There are some scenarios in which repayment caps do not apply:

  • If a person projected an income below 400 percent of the poverty level (and received premium subsidies during the year based on that projection) but then ends up with an actual income above 400 percent of the poverty level (ie, not eligible for subsidies), the entire subsidy amount that was paid on their behalf has to be repaid to the IRS.
  • If a person projected an income at or above 100 percent of the poverty level (and received premium subsidies) but then ends up with an income below the poverty level (ie, not eligible for subsidies), none of the subsidy has to be repaid. This is confirmed in the instructions for Form 8962, on page 8, in the section about Line 6 (Estimated household income at least 100% of the federal poverty line). But there are new rules as of 2019 that make it less likely for people with income below the poverty level to qualify for premium subsidies based on income projections that are above the poverty level. This is explained in more detail here.

Is there any help for me if I have to repay premium subsidies?

The IRS noted that they would “consider possible avenues of administrative relief” for tax filers who are struggling to pay back excess APTC, including such options as payment plans and the waiver of interest and penalties for people who must return subsidy over-payments. If you find yourself in a situation where you must pay back a significant amount of the premium subsidies you received during the prior year, contact the IRS to see if you can work out a favorable payment plan/interest arrangement.

It’s also worth noting that contributions to a pre-tax retirement account and/or a health savings account will reduce your ACA-specific modified adjusted gross income, which is what the IRS uses to determine your premium tax credit eligibility. If you had HSA-qualified health coverage during the year, you can make HSA contributions up until the tax filing deadline the following spring. And IRA contributions can also be made up until the tax filing deadline. You’ll want to talk with your tax advisor to see what makes the most sense given your specific circumstances, but you may find that some pre-tax savings end up making you eligible for a premium subsidy afterall, or reduce the amount that you’d otherwise have to repay.

The COVID pandemic caused widespread financial uncertainty and employment upheavals throughout much of 2020. Additional federal unemployment benefits were provided to millions of people, but there are concerns that the premium tax credit reconciliation could be particularly challenging during the 2021 tax filing season, with many people having to repay subsidies that were paid on their behalf during a time they were unemployed in 2020.

In December 2020, insurance commissioners from 11 states sent a letter to President-elect Biden, recommending various immediate and long-term actions designed to improve access to health coverage and care. One of the short-term recommendations is to provide relief from subsidy claw-backs for the 2020 tax year. Even in the best of times, it can be challenging to accurately project your income for the coming year, but the uncertainty caused by the COVID pandemic made this much more challenging than usual. So it’s possible that the Biden administration and/or Congress might be able to take action to provide some relief in this area, for at least the 2020 tax year.

What if you get employer-sponsored health insurance mid-year?

Most non-elderly Americans get their health coverage from an employer. Individual health insurance is great for filling in the gaps between jobs, but what happens if you start off the year without access to an affordable employer-sponsored health insurance plan, and then get a job mid-year that provides health coverage?

If a premium subsidy was paid on your behalf during the months you had individual market coverage, you may end up having to repay some or all of the subsidy when you file your tax return. It all depends on your total income for the year, including income from your new job. If your total income still ends up being in line with the estimate you provided when you applied for your subsidy, you won’t have to pay that money back. But if your actual income for the year ends up being substantially higher than you initially projected, you may end up having to repay some or all of that subsidy when you file your taxes.

It doesn’t matter that your income was lower when you were covered under the individual market plan. In the eyes of the IRS, annual income is annual income — it can be evenly distributed throughout the year, or come in the form of a windfall on December 31. (As noted above, insurance commissioners have urged the Biden administration to consider ways of providing relief on this issue for the 2020 tax year, given that it was even more challenging than normal to accurately project an annual income during the COVID panemic).

Once you become eligible for an affordable health insurance plan through your employer that provides minimum value, you’re no longer eligible for premium subsidies as of the month you become eligible for the employer’s plan. But premium tax credit reconciliation is done on a month-by-month basis, so as long as your total income for the year is still in the subsidy-eligible range, you’ll almost certainly still be eligible for at least some amount of subsidy for the months when you had a plan that you purchased through the exchange.

Finally, if you’re offered health insurance through an employer that you feel is too expensive based on the share you have to pay, you can’t just opt out, buy your own health plan, and attempt to snag a subsidy. The fact that an affordable plan (by IRS definitions) is available to you renders you ineligible for money toward your premiums. Unfortunately, the cost of obtaining family coverage is not taken into consideration when determining whether an employer-sponsored plan is affordable, which leaves some families stuck without a viable coverage option.

How many people have to repay premium subsidies?

For 2015 coverage, subsidies were reconciled when taxes were filed in early 2016. The IRS reported in early 2017 that about 3.3 million tax filers who received APTC in 2015 had to repay a portion of the subsidy when they filed their 2015 taxes; the average amount that had to be repaid was about $870, and 60 percent of people who had to pay back excess APTC still received a refund once the excess APTC was subtracted from their initial refund. [IRS data for premium tax credit reporting is available here; as of 2019, data had only been reported for the 2014 and 2015 tax years.]

But on the opposite end of the spectrum, about 2.4 million tax filers who were eligible for a premium tax credit ended up receiving all or some of it when they filed their return. These are people who either paid full price for their exchange plan in 2015 but ended up qualifying for a subsidy based on their 2015 income, or people who got an APTC that was less than the amount for which they ultimately qualified. The average amount of additional premium tax credit paid out on tax returns for 2015 was $670.

[The IRS noted that it was very uncommon for people to pay full price for their coverage and wait to claim their full refund on their return: 98 percent of the people who claimed a premium tax credit on their return had received at least some APTC during the year.]

Louise Norris is an individual health insurance broker who has been writing about health insurance and health reform since 2006. She has written dozens of opinions and educational pieces about the Affordable Care Act for healthinsurance.org. Her state health exchange updates are regularly cited by media who cover health reform and by other health insurance experts.

The post What happens if my income changes and my premium subsidy is too big? Will I have to repay it? appeared first on healthinsurance.org.

 

Maddox Insurance Agency

Insurance Agency in Memphis, Tennessee

Main Office

2151 Courtland Place | Memphis, TN 38104

Licensed in Tennessee, Mississippi & Arkansas

Contact

Phone: (901) 335-0154
Fax: (901) 255-9141

Lee.Maddox@maddoxinsured.com

Follow Us On